Mon blog est entitulé “rechercher”. C’est un mot francais. Il vient du nom du livre A La Recherche DuTemps Perdu qui a écrivé par Marcel Proust. La raison pourquoi je utilise ce mot parce que à mon avis, l’essentiel est invisible pour les yeux, alors, on ne voit bien qu’avec le coeur, et ca c’est re-chercher…

  Anyway, the reason I chose “rechercher” (which means “re-search for” in English) as my blog title was because in my opinion, since we are surrounded by our environment, we are situated in various contexts and occupying multiple identites within ourselves, sometimes, we need to re-look ourselves, our societies, even our world from a different perspective by our hearts, because sometimes what we’ve seen by our eyes was not always the truth. So I adopt my way of seeing myself, my surroudings through the lens of my camera, which was illustrated above as my blog pic. And thanks to the lecture on “Identity and Investment in SLL Learning” delivered by Bonny Norton, I think now I have a better understanding of the concept of “investment” in SLL, and it also develops my understanding of Bourdieu’s concept of “symbolic capital” within L2 learners various discourses. Thus, I related all the life aspects together from the sociocultural perspective by emphasizing the interwoven power relations. Under my blog theme as “power issues”, I reflected on different areas, such as on family, on animal, on arts…and I think there exists power, there exists inequity. Also in the last piece, I chose my blog theme song sung by Black Eyed Peas— Where is the love, to express an idea of being harmonius as a whole family. Although those issues can not be solved overnight, actually it takes a long, long time, at least, we are heading to that direction along with our hope and resolution !!

 

           t-chasing-light1
                                                                      Chasing the Light of Truth.

Yes, we can
 “ Lorsque nous avons surmont
é des épreuves apparemment insurmontables; lorsqu’on nous a dit que nous n’étions pas prêts, ou qu’il ne fallait pas essayer, ou que nous ne pouvions pas, des générations d’Américains ont répondu par un simple credo qui ré

sume l’esprit d’un peuple.
  Oui, nous pouvons.

  Ce credo était inscrit dans les documents fondateurs qui déclaraient la destinée d’un pays.
  Oui, nous pouvons.

 

  Il a été murmuré par les esclaves et les abolitionnistes ouvrant une voie de lumière vers la liberté dans la plus ténébreuse des nuits.
  Oui, nous pouvons.

 

  Il a été chanté par les immigrants qui quittaient de lointains rivages et par les pionniers qui progressaient vers l’ouest en dé

pir d’une nature impitoyable.
  Oui, nous pouvons.

  Ce fut l’appel des ouvriers qui se syndiquaient; des femmes qui luttaient pour le droit de vote; d’un président qui fit de la Lune notre nouvelle frontière; et d’un King qui nous a conduits au sommet de la montagne et nous a montré

le chemin de la Terre promise.

  Oui, nous pouvons la justice et l’égalité.
  Oui, nous pouvons les chances et la prosp
érité.

  Oui, nous pouvons guérir cette nation.
  Oui, nous pouvons r
éparer ce monde.
 
  Oui, nous pouvon.”
                                  —– Barack Obama.

 

 

 

 

                   

 

  American Idol is an American reality-competition show airing on Fox. It debuted on June 11, 2002, and it has since become one of the most popular shows on American television. The program seeks to discover the best singer in the country through a series of nationwide auditions. The outcomes of the later stages of this competition are determined by public voting by phone. Some of the rules for the competetors are: Singers are not permitted to have any current record deals or talent management agreements (though they may have had one at some point in the past). They must be U.S. citizens or permanent residents eligible to work full-time and, for the first three seasons, had to be 16 to 24 years of age on October 19 of the year of audition. Since the fourth season, the upper age limit was raised to 28 with an earlier cutoff date, August 4, to attract more mature and diverse contestants. Even if a person is eligible, he or she may not have a chance to audition or be seen because the show can see only a limited number of people in each city.

 

Barack Obama is now the president-elect of the United States after running a long and gruel race, firstly by defeating Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries and then defeating John McCain in the presidential elections. And the whole process of the campaign, to some extent, is like the American Idol competition. Both of them are choosing the best; both of them are through a series of nationwide auditions/ speeches; both of results are come out by voting; both of them demand a U.S. citizen; and the chance to be “the one” is extremely slim. Anyway, after Americans invaded into the Iraq indulgently without clearly stated the reason; after U.S. encountered the subprime lending crisis …, I think Americans need an idol at this time, they need a hero at this time, they need someone who says “change has come to America” at this time. So, everything is just in time. Obama becomes an “American Idol”.

  On the other hand, in my opinion, each American Presidents won their elections, to some extent, by their speech. The fluency and the appropriate use of the words in their language; the intonation in their speeches; the pitch in their speeches; the stress and pause in their speeches; their voice volume, their gestures, their determined face expressions, emotions adopted in their speeches and of course the content, which all contribute to a good speech.

  There also another reason which guided Obama to be the newly session of America President, because he is in the Democratic Party, while Maccain is in the Republic, the same as Bush’s. In my opinion, because during Bush’s tenurial, due to many of his throughtless decisions, the American people lose hearts of him and his Party. Although Maccain wanted to make an annovation in policies, it was still hard to subvert those previous made decisions at once, especially being rooted in the same Party. When facing the loss of civic faith, that means a problem. Because one might imagine that the solution would be for a government to make itself worthy of its citizen’s faith. However, the truth is that the government or/and other powerful institutions will not become worthy of trust until citizens take positive action to hold them to accout. Thus, the American people chose someone who would give them hope and posibilities.

  In the phrase “we, the people…” in American Constitution expressed the recolutionary idea that “the people” could set up a “government of their own, under their own authority”. In the years from about 1776 to 1791, most of the fundamental principles of the American society were expressed. The great phrases echoes in American’s mind that “the consent of the governed…equality…the blessings of liberty…the establishment of justice…”. Anyway, Rome is not built in one day. After Jefferson’s brave declaration of “all men are created equal”, it took 87 years and a bloody civil war to free the slaves, and another 57 years before “we, the people”, gave women the vote. “Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton sparked the 19th century battle for women’s rights. Samuel Gompers, an immigrant, stabilized the labor movement. Andrew Carnegie, born in Scotland the son of a poor Scots weaver, became one of America’s industrial pioneers and wrote an important chapter in America’s philanthropic tradition. In the 1930s and 1940s Thurgood Marshall and his colleagues crafted the legal victories that laid the ground for the 1954 Supereme Court decision on school desegregation, and then Martin Luther King, Jr. transformed the race issue from a legal battle to a popular movement. Betty Friedan touched off the mid-20th century struggle for women’s right. La Donna Harris, Ada Deer, John Echohawk and others put the rights of Native Americans on the agenda. Cesar Chaves gave voice and power to the Hispanic farm workers of California.” (American History, 1998) We know that it is difficult that diverse segments of the population exist within one nation, because we don’t know one antother, or maybe we don’t want to know each other in most of the time. Race creates such divisions. And the growing gap between rich and poor also appears grave difficulties. Also there is resentment among so many Americans of what whey might consider to be an emerging professional/ academic elite that alwauys appears to be close to the levels of power. Anyway, since the hisroty goes and more consciousness awaken, more and more people become recgnize that the government working alone will not save the nation, thus, collaboration is needed. Collaboration among various levels within and outside the government; collaboration among each citizens. Justice, freedom and equality would be on everyone’s list. We admit that most of us are not Utopian that we do not dream of a perfect world, but that is not to say we can abandon our efforts to make it less imperfect!

  Obama is a black-americam, so what? At least he showed up when the States needed him. His President election shows the whole nation’s resolution and confidence of being better, by screaming “Yes, we can !!”.

Barack Obama on Election Night:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfHbw3n0EIM&feature=channel

 

Related Links:
Barack Obama’s Biography: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
Barack Obama’s full speech–”A More Perfect Union”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrp-v2tHaDo&feature=related

 

Episode theme song by Black Eyed Peas: Where Is The Love?

Lyrics: http://www.lyrics007.com/Black%20Eyed%20Peas%20Lyrics/Where%20Is%20The%20Love%20Lyrics.html


There exists hierarchy in every species as well as power exists ubiquitously. Then, there is power, there is inequalities, even among animals as well.

At the time when I visited the Greater Vancouver Zoo & the aquarium in Stanley Park, I realised that to be survival is really hard not only for human beings but also for those so-called less intelligent animals in the world. And it seems impossible to escape from  the underlying and intricate power relations, I believe for every species.

Take monkeys as an example. When I standed outside the monkey’s cage, observing them grabbing foods from some visitors who threw at them, I found there was a “monkey-king” among the six monkeys in that cage. He seems held the power. Why? Because each time, visitors threw food into the cage, it was always “the king” who climed up or lept over to catch it. There is no chance for any other monkeys in that cage, because they seemed to show absolute obedience to the king. Even when the food were thrown from different directions at the same time, under the circumstances that the king didn’t have the time to grab all of them, the peer monkeys were afraid of climbing up and grabing them. It is pathetic, but it is the rule in their life. However, the above situation I observed happened in a zoo situated in China instead of the Greater Vancouver Zoo in Canada. Because in my opinion, the GVZ in canada had already turned itself into a more lived and humanized place for animals— the governmental policies; the high-disciplined visitors, the zoo officials and keeper took good care of them, thus almost each species of animals were placed individually (a pair to the most), so it will be impossible for visitors to observe the food-grabbing issue here, which in turn, to some extent, I think those student-visitors will lose the opportunity to know animals from this perspective.

Fishes are as well. When I visited the aquarium in the Stanley Park, I found that biggest fish were always “hiding” at the back of its tank. However, when the feeder appeared, the biggest fish who occupied the dominant power would appear at the front and always catches the food at the first second.

Thus, from both of the cases, there exist a dominant hierarchy (while in human’s world, it is represented as ‘social hierarchy/ social stratfication’). “A dominance hierarchy is the organization of individuals in a group that occures when competition of resources lead to aggression.” Researches showed that “dominance herarchies occur in most social animal species, including primates who normally live in groups. Dominance hierarchies have been extensively studied in fish, birds and mammals. Dominance hierarchies often arise from the physical differences among individuals in a group in relation to their access to resources. Individuals with greater hierarchical status tend to displace those ranked lower from access to space, to food and to mating opportunities ( eg: Seahorse). Thus, individuals with higher social status tend to have greater reproductive success by mating more often and having more resources to invest in the survival of offspring. Anyway, those hierarchies are not fixed and depend on any numver of changing factors, among them are age, gender, body size, intelligence, and aggressiveness. Status may also be affected by the ability to marshal the support of others.

Chimpazees in the wild fight over who’s in charge of the jungle:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBUaAx0Duqg

Hierarchy of Multiple Dogs:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEREqGYs1zQ

Related link:
About Dominance Hierarchy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_hierarchy

About Pecking Order: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecking_order .

 

                    y1ppn0pu4cbo-anlokzd-xfqt9d_ot1qtbndtfqgsmhvj-zk0pztjdff3swhvd1ue9q     
                                           Desire. Peep.                                      

Masters of Photography:
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRPCHgHsNXM

 

In last episode (Episode 2), I mentioned the brightness of colors created a contrast in paintings, which not only showed the inequal power in chromatism, but those masterpieces also present their powerful meanings by themselves.

      

Power comes in many shapes and sizes. Along with being recognized in attributes such as wealth, authority, knowledge, athletic excellence, and self-determination, power is found in representation. To be depicted is a way of being empowered as is determining who or what is to be represented. A photo’s ability to represent or frame a historical/social memory, and to define a person, place, or time is an enormous power. Though the emergence of photography democratized representation to a degree, it has continued to propagate visual tropes of other visual art practices. As we find ourselves in an era where the controls over how and what is represented have increased simultaneous to the democratization of image publishing and distribution created by the Internet, the discussion of locations of power and the politics of representation are most pertinent. In this episode, I’m interested in talking photos, especially those black and white photos. In today’s color-dominant world, I wonder how black and white photos take their own values and still be classic.

 
It is said that everything сomes around full сirсle, сreating a сyсle. This is most сertainly the сase with reemergenсe of blank and white photography onto the sсene. Why is blaсk and white photography beсoming en vogue again in a world that so emphasizes сolor? Despite the inсredible popularity of digital photography in general, and сreation of сolor images in partiсular, there will always be room for blaсk and white.

 

But that was сertainly not the сase. Over the years we have seen blaсk and white take on a new artistiс value in both genres. In faсt, it is not at all unusual any more to see a very modern movie filmed entirely in blaсk and white. It is also сommon to visit a fine art museum and find a photographiс art display that uses blaсk and white extensively. Blaсk and white has some artistiс and emotional qualities that are just not possible to aсhieve in сolor photography.

 

The most important faсtor in photography is the feeling it invokes in the viewer. Blaсk and white photography has this emotional power. Even the most unassuming of shots сan take on new depth and meaning emotionally with the subtle nuanсes the blaсk and white format сan provide. Be the ability to сonvey the unspoken word, blaсk and white photos almost instantly take on an artistiс look.  

Blaсk and white also foсuses the eye on the emotional сenter of the pieсe. Probably the best subjeсt for blaсk and white photography is the human faсe. In even a tranquil expression, the viewer сan see suсh a vast range of expression in the eyes, the tilt of the head, the subtle wrinkles or peсuliarities of the faсe and the foсus of the gaze.

 

While emotional power and invoking the searсh for meaning makes for сompelling reasons to inсorporate blaсk and white photography into one’s portfolio alone, the romanсe of the genre is most сertainly another. Blaсk-and-white photography speaks to the simpliсity and eleganсe that love often is. It has the ability to сapture the thread of emotion and passion that touсhes the heart. A piсture that might be сonsidered lewd by the harshness of сolor, beсomes an art form in the more subtle shadings of blaсk and white.


An experienсed blaсk and white photographer has developed the ability to live in a world сhoosing when to and more importantly when not to see сolor. With praсtiсe, you сan find these skills within yourself and have a whole new seсond world opened up before your сamera’s lens. Digital photography teсhniques have provided a new generation for the art of blaсk and white photography. From a newborn’s first photograph, to a new bride’s gaze into her future, blaсk and white photography has made a reemergenсe due to the emotional impaсt it makes in сontrast to its сolor filled сounterpart.

  

It be worth the time to learn how to сapture the powerful images that blaсk and white photography сan сreate. You will in no time be able to see the world in blaсk and white from behind the сamera lens giving you a whole new world of possibilities in photography.” (http://netic.co.za)  

 

 

 

                  under-the-bridge   
                                            Under the bridge
                le-enfance-jete1
                                                             Un enfant le jété 

                 e992a2e7ad8be59f8ee5b882
                                                      Steel + Concrete = City
                e5a49ce69ca6e883a7e38082e79cbce69ca6e883a7e38082
                                                 Condolence of the Past

                e4b8bae4ba86e4bb80e4b988-e694bee5bc83e9a39ee7bf94-0810272
                                                       The Reason of Falling

The world is becoming more and more “colorful” by all means. People immersed in the environment may can not see it properly. Thus, sometimes by seeing through camera lens the plainest, may lead us to realise the pure aspects of our lives, and appreciate them more … 

 

 

 


    Munch’s The Scream is an icon of modern art, a Mona Lisa for our time. As Leonardo da Vinci evoked a Renaissance ideal of serenity and self-control, Munch defined how we see our own age—wracked with anxiety and uncertainty. e59190e5968a3His painting of a sexless, twisted, fetal-faced creature, with mouth and eyes open wide in a shriek of horror, re-created a vision that had seized him as he walked one evening in his youth with two friends at sunset. As he later described it, the “air turned to blood” and the “faces of my comrades became a garish yellow-white.” Vibrating in his ears he heard “a huge endless scream course through nature.” By using vivid contrast of red, yellow, blue and black, it seems that it is the colors who is screaming. I like this painting most out of Munch’s work because I think its power not only resides in the visual sense, but also in the acoustic sense. It wakes views’ whole body to taste it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.   guernica-picasso

In 2010, Shanghai will hold the World Expo, while in 1937, the Spanish rulers commissioned Pablo Picasso to create a big mural for the Spanish display at the Paris International Exposition (the 1937 World’s Fair in Paris). The Guernica bombing inspired Picasso. Guernica shows the tragedies of war and the suffering war inflicts upon individuals. On completion Guernica was displayed around the world in a brief tour, becoming famous and widely acclaimed. Within fifteen days of the attack, Pablo Picasso began painting this mural. This tour brought the Spanish civil war to the world’s attention.

 

 

Guernica presents a scene of death, violence, brutality, suffering, and helplessness without portraying their immediate causes. The choice to paint in black and white conveys the chronological nearness of a newspaper photograph and the lifelessness war affords. Guernica depicts suffering people, animals, and buildings wrenched by violence and chaos.

 

The overall scene is within a room where, at an open end on the left, a wide-eyed bull stands over a woman grieving over a dead child in her arms.

The centre is occupied by a horse falling in agony as it had just been run through by a spear or javelin. The shape of a human skull forms the horse’s nose and upper teeth.

Two “hidden” images formed by the horse appear in Guernica (illustrated to the right):

A human skull overlays the horse’s body.

A bull appears to gore the horse from underneath. The bull’s head is formed mainly by the horse’s entire front leg which has the knee on the ground. The leg’s knee cap forms the head’s nose. A horn appears within the horse’s breast.

The bulls tail forms the image of a flame with smoke rising from it, seemingly appearing in a window created by the lighter shade of gray surrounding it.

Under the horse is a dead, apparently dismembered soldier, his hand on a severed arm still grasps a shattered sword from which a flower grows.

A light bulb blazes in the shape of an eye over the suffering horse’s head (the bare bulb of the torturer’s cell.)

To the upper right of the horse, a frightened female figure, who seems to be witnessing the scenes before her, appears to have floated into the room through a window. Her arm, also floating in, carries a flame-lit lamp.

From the right, an awe-struck woman staggers towards the center below the floating female figure. She looks up blankly into the blazing light bulb.

Daggers that suggest screaming replace the tongues of the bull, grieving woman, and horse.

A bird, possibly a dove, stands on a shelf behind the bull in panic.

On the far right, a figure with arms raised in terror is entrapped by fire from above and below.

A dark wall with an open door defines the right end of the mural.

There are stigmata (the supposed marks on the hands of those who have “suffered as Jesus”) on the hands of the dead soldier. Picasso was not religious, although he was brought up in the predominantly Catholic Spain, and these symbols are not to be interpreted as Christian identification This, instead, reflects the idea that all of us suffer often without cause. Here Picasso is using a well recognisable image to demonstrate how we are all like Christ, in that we all suffer and eventually die.

Thus, this monumental work has eclipsed the bounds of a single time and place, becoming a perpetual reminder of the tragedies of war, an anti-war symbol, and an embodiment of peace.

 3.     where-do-we-come-from

                        

 D’oǜ venons-nous? Que sommes-nous? Oǜ allons-nous? (Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?) is an oil painting on canvas created by Paul Gauguin in 1897.

This is Gauguin’s ultimate masterpiece – if all the Gauguins in the world, except one, were to be evaporated (perish the thought!), this would be the one to preserve. He claimed that he did not think of the long title until the work was finished, but he is known to have been creative with the truth. The picture is so superbly organized into three “scoops” – a circle to right and to left, and a great oval in the center – that I cannot but believe he had his questions in mind from the start. I am often tempted to forget that these are questions, and to think that he is suggesting answers, but there are no answers here; there are three fundamental questions, posed visually.

On the right (Where do we come from?), we see the baby, and three young women – those who are closest to that eternal mystery. In the center, Gauguin meditates on what we are. Here are two women, talking about destiny (or so he described them), a man looking puzzled and half-aggressive, and in the middle, a youth plucking the fruit of experience. This has nothing to do, I feel sure, with the Garden of Eden; it is humanity’s innocent and natural desire to live and to search for more life. A child eats the fruit, overlooked by the remote presence of an idol – emblem of our need for the spiritual. There are women (one mysteriously curled up into a shell), and there are animals with whom we share the world: a goat, a cat, and kittens. In the final section (Where are we going?), a beautiful young woman broods, and an old woman prepares to die. Her pallor and gray hair tell us so, but the message is underscored by the presence of a strange white bird. I once described it as “a mutated puffin,” and I do not think I can do better. It is Gauguin’s symbol of the afterlife, of the unknown (just as the dog, on the far right, is his symbol of himself).

All this is set in a paradise of tropical beauty: the Tahiti of sunlight, freedom, and color that Gauguin left everything to find. A little river runs through the woods, and behind it is a great slash of brilliant blue sea, with the misty mountains of another island rising beyond Gauguin wanted to make it absolutely clear that this picture was his testament. He seems to have concocted a story that, being ill and unappreciated (that part was true enough), he determined on suicide – the great refusal. He wrote to a friend, describing his journey into the mountains with arsenic. Then he found himself still alive, and returned to paint more masterworks. It is sad that so great an artist felt he needed to manufacture a ploy to get people to appreciate his work. I wish he could see us now, looking with awe at this supreme painting.

 

It is a very powerful masterpiece. It represents the history of human being and the heart-serenity people want to obtain in the modern, materialized society.

Paintings can not speak, but they use their own way teaching us to speak, speak for them, speak for our own.

 

 

 

 

 

Episode 1: On Parents & Children
                e6b0b4e785aee9b1bc-e6b7a1e88f9c

 

 

In Chinese tradition, filial is taken for the first ranking moral character in a person. Because everything we own is from our parents both material and spiritual. Someone may argue that when we grow up, we will earn everything by ourselves. That’s right, but what if you think “without being ‘you’, how could you earn those stuffs?”. Thus, in a traditional Chinese family, among parents and their children, even among several generations within a big family, there exists a hidden regulation: the older, the more powerful. (Even the one may not really have power in the society, but at least in the family, age counts!) Actually, it’s not age, but experiences. Thus, there are some sayings which used by parents to teach a lesson to their children “Don’t speak when we adults are talking. What do you know? You are just kid! The salt we ate is even much more than the rice you had!”

 Nowadays, the power in Chinese family, I think may have been shifted from age to various more “open” contents (however, I think the experience one still keeps its dorminant position), such as richness in knowledge, skills which current genaration acquires but the previous generation doesn’t. Let’s take one of the skills— cooking as an example in my family to illustrate this point. In my three persons, small family, my mother is the cook. It’s not only because in the history, woman are always playing the role of being a care-giver situated within a family, but also because she cooks delicious meals. In my family, all of we three can cook, since both my father and I  can not surpass my mother’s cooking skill, so she becomes powerful in the kitchen. One of the anedotes is: although both my father and I like having meals accompanied by soups, only because my mother doesn’t like it, à she never! Ok…seldomly makes soupe… Due the power limitation in the kitchen and both of my father and I lack of cooking skill, we have been “oppressed” until now. However, I think “power” is also tricky. Since I left for university in another city and my post-graduate studied aborad, I improved my cooking skills or even better than my mother’s, but I still pretended to be “oppressed” when I went back home. Why? Because I know someone needs power in certain fields in a family, my mother needs the belonging to be admired being a good cook in the hearts of my father and I. Thus, I surrendered to being as an “oppressed”, that’s one of the ways I express my filial in my life.

 

 

 

 

                e785a7e78987-003

                crabs

                    


   Today, Prof. Bonny Norton delivered a lecture concerning with SLL identity at SFU. In recent years, there has been increasing research on the relationship between identity and language learning, and the way language learning is influenced by institutional and community practices in diverse sites of power. Thus her presentation traces the trajectory of my research on identity,investment, and imagined communities, focusing on more recent research in the African context. The presentation concludes with an examination of new directions in research on identity and language learning, including digital opportunities for providing a wider range of identities for language learners. 

 
   
 Norton sees language more from a post-structuralist perspective, like we learned in the EDUC 714’S class before our professor Bonnie left for China, that language is a site of struggle; meaning is contested; and power is implicated. Also in that class’s group discussion, we also talked about “subjectivity” in the chapter of “Adopting a critical perspective on pedagogy”(page.30-31). Yet, Norton claims that “subjectivity” is the centrality of all relationships. It is a subject of a position of power, and it is subjected to a position of limited power.

 
Norton perfers the idea of “investment” rather than “motivation” in SLL. She thinks motivation is unitary, coherent, ahistorical; while investment is a complex identity, it changes across time and space, and reproduced in social interactions. Language is a social practice. Investment is a construction. People speak from their different identites when they are situated within different contexts.

   

 

 

  The pic showed that Miranda, Quincy and I, as a group describing our understandings of “symbolic capital” which was initially devised by Pierre Bourdieu in EDUC 714’s class in September 30th..

  “Symbolic Capital” is “institutionally recognised and legitimated authority and entitlement requisite for the exchange and conversion of cultural, economic and social capital”. Among the three branches,
Cultural Capital also embodies Embodied Capital (knowledge, skills, dispositions, linguistic practices and representational resources of the bodily habitus), Objectified Capital (cultural goods, texts, material objects and media physically transmissible to others), and Institutional Capital (academic qualifications, awards, professional certificates and credentials);
Economic Capital includes material goods and resources directly convertible into money;
Social Capital means access to cultural and subcultural institutions, social relations and practices.
            —-Carrington, V. & Luke, A. (1997). Literacy and Bourdieu’s Sociological Theory: A Reframing

  In the portfolio, we mainly examplified different streams of capital. For example, in the pic on the upper left corner, a teacher is teaching English to her students; also on the left bottom corner, a football player is kicking a soccer; which described as an embodied capital of one of the cultural capital branch. In the middle, with the headline of “Head of the class”in Carlifornia University, U.S.A., showed academic qualification as an institutional capital as one of the cultural capital branch. Futher, on the right column of the portfolio, both the Cucci watch and the “lovely” perfume designed by the celebrity—Jessica Parker, symplified the material goods as economic capital. Also the pic expressing the idea of “warm-house party” which above Jessica Parker and the pic which captured two “les” kissing, both to some extent showed accesses to cultural communities, social relations as a social capital.

  Most important is we wrote “The Hallway”(means a process) in the middle as the theme of our portfolio, because we thought all the skills, material objects, professional certificates and access to social practices were our living contexts. The essence was not we own them or not, the importance was how we could gain them by using positive and right methods. History advances without considering how people live, however, we still make progresses compared to the past. We can not own the contribution to ourselves, we’d thank because we step on our “past”, we stand on giant’s shoulders…

On peut chercher les surprises dans notre vies en semble. Allez-y!